<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Benny's Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.drtritsch.com/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.drtritsch.com</link>
	<description>Terminal Servers, Remote Desktop Services and Presentation Virtualization</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 22:53:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Remoting Protocols - In Quest For Truth by Tweets that mention Benny’s Blog » Blog Archive » Remoting Protocols - In Quest For Truth -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://blog.drtritsch.com/?p=110&cpage=1#comment-112</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Benny’s Blog » Blog Archive » Remoting Protocols - In Quest For Truth -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 17:50:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.drtritsch.com/?p=110#comment-112</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by stevegreenberg. stevegreenberg said: RT @drtritsch: See my new blog article: &#34;Remoting Protocols - In Quest for the Truth&#34; - http://bit.ly/aRcqE1 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by stevegreenberg. stevegreenberg said: RT @drtritsch: See my new blog article: &quot;Remoting Protocols - In Quest for the Truth&quot; - <a href="http://bit.ly/aRcqE1" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/aRcqE1</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on MVP Summit 2010 – Microsoft’s Universe of Virtualization by uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://blog.drtritsch.com/?p=96&cpage=1#comment-109</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 07:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.drtritsch.com/?p=96#comment-109</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by robsanders: @drtritsch I like your post (http://bit.ly/dBvuxV), good analysis. I don't completely agree, but good start for discussion at Synergy!...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by robsanders: @drtritsch I like your post (http://bit.ly/dBvuxV), good analysis. I don&#8217;t completely agree, but good start for discussion at Synergy!&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why IT Architecture sucks in many Corporate Environments by Steve Greenberg</title>
		<link>http://blog.drtritsch.com/?p=85&cpage=1#comment-97</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Greenberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 08:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.drtritsch.com/?p=85#comment-97</guid>
		<description>Benny,

Great article and insight. I have to agree with your points completely, this is exactly my experience. Even though I consider myself and my colleagues excellent architects we really do not have very good tools as you say. In the absense of these tools we assure quality control through careful analysis of previous experience. Every project is a little bit different and a little bit better than the previous one as we learn from experience and make constant improvements.

However, when the design is complete is ends up as a Word document. All the data is there, the justifications and decisions, but as you point out there has to be a better way!!

thanks

Steve Greenberg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Benny,</p>
<p>Great article and insight. I have to agree with your points completely, this is exactly my experience. Even though I consider myself and my colleagues excellent architects we really do not have very good tools as you say. In the absense of these tools we assure quality control through careful analysis of previous experience. Every project is a little bit different and a little bit better than the previous one as we learn from experience and make constant improvements.</p>
<p>However, when the design is complete is ends up as a Word document. All the data is there, the justifications and decisions, but as you point out there has to be a better way!!</p>
<p>thanks</p>
<p>Steve Greenberg</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why IT Architecture sucks in many Corporate Environments by Michael Keen</title>
		<link>http://blog.drtritsch.com/?p=85&cpage=1#comment-96</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Keen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 21:26:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.drtritsch.com/?p=85#comment-96</guid>
		<description>Benny

great article!!  The bigger question that I eluded to in my Tweet was where is the Enterprise Architecture, IT Governance, and IT Portfolio Management in these companies?  IT Architects are at the solution level and without the proper tools like what I mentioned above, it will always be viewed the way you put it, "IT Architecture sucks".  

There are many frameworks like TOGAF, Zachman, Gartner, etc, but they need to be in place and used, which all comes back to the C-level folks.

I think this conversation needs to continue, but I at least wanted to get my two cents out here to get to the real issue which lies at a much higher level than at the IT Architecture level.

Cheers
Michael</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Benny</p>
<p>great article!!  The bigger question that I eluded to in my Tweet was where is the Enterprise Architecture, IT Governance, and IT Portfolio Management in these companies?  IT Architects are at the solution level and without the proper tools like what I mentioned above, it will always be viewed the way you put it, &#8220;IT Architecture sucks&#8221;.  </p>
<p>There are many frameworks like TOGAF, Zachman, Gartner, etc, but they need to be in place and used, which all comes back to the C-level folks.</p>
<p>I think this conversation needs to continue, but I at least wanted to get my two cents out here to get to the real issue which lies at a much higher level than at the IT Architecture level.</p>
<p>Cheers<br />
Michael</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why IT Architecture sucks in many Corporate Environments by Steve Ortman</title>
		<link>http://blog.drtritsch.com/?p=85&cpage=1#comment-95</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Ortman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 20:39:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.drtritsch.com/?p=85#comment-95</guid>
		<description>I agree wholeheartedly.  I have played the role of part time architect several times now and your post describes the typical situation to a tee.  The management side of things is particularly irksome.  I think you can go a step further that many in management want to leave their "stamp" on a particular part of the IT infrastructure, regardless of whether it makes sense and often with a strong bias towards the latest fads or personal preference, and eager to throw out past investments to erase the legacy of the previous regime.  The parallel to the failed auto industry here is quite strong - executives with no real idea of the market needs loved to put their stamp on a car's design ("Opera" windows, anyone?).  
On the problem of tools - I also agree.  However, do you have a solution or product (even if it's imperfect) that you think would help?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree wholeheartedly.  I have played the role of part time architect several times now and your post describes the typical situation to a tee.  The management side of things is particularly irksome.  I think you can go a step further that many in management want to leave their &#8220;stamp&#8221; on a particular part of the IT infrastructure, regardless of whether it makes sense and often with a strong bias towards the latest fads or personal preference, and eager to throw out past investments to erase the legacy of the previous regime.  The parallel to the failed auto industry here is quite strong - executives with no real idea of the market needs loved to put their stamp on a car&#8217;s design (&#8221;Opera&#8221; windows, anyone?).<br />
On the problem of tools - I also agree.  However, do you have a solution or product (even if it&#8217;s imperfect) that you think would help?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why IT Architecture sucks in many Corporate Environments by Ulrich Stamm</title>
		<link>http://blog.drtritsch.com/?p=85&cpage=1#comment-94</link>
		<dc:creator>Ulrich Stamm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 19:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.drtritsch.com/?p=85#comment-94</guid>
		<description>Hy Benny,

there ARE Tools .... in very big companies there are tools that are so complicated, that noone is able to do something  right with it... the kitchen example is a good one :-) in the IT department, they know what they are doing, but they often do not have the protection and the support from the next stage on the ladder above.

Things are getting more complicated because in the last three years some little products grew to strategic fields and there is a greater need for know how and supporting systems in the back. 

Regards,
 Ulrich</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hy Benny,</p>
<p>there ARE Tools &#8230;. in very big companies there are tools that are so complicated, that noone is able to do something  right with it&#8230; the kitchen example is a good one <img src='http://blog.drtritsch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> in the IT department, they know what they are doing, but they often do not have the protection and the support from the next stage on the ladder above.</p>
<p>Things are getting more complicated because in the last three years some little products grew to strategic fields and there is a greater need for know how and supporting systems in the back. </p>
<p>Regards,<br />
 Ulrich</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why IT Architecture sucks in many Corporate Environments by uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://blog.drtritsch.com/?p=85&cpage=1#comment-93</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 23:42:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.drtritsch.com/?p=85#comment-93</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by brianmadden: From Benny Tritsch (@drtritsch) "Why IT Architecture sucks in many Corporate Environments" http://bit.ly/6Qx3pk Great stuff!...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by brianmadden: From Benny Tritsch (@drtritsch) &#8220;Why IT Architecture sucks in many Corporate Environments&#8221; <a href="http://bit.ly/6Qx3pk" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/6Qx3pk</a> Great stuff!&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why IT Architecture sucks in many Corporate Environments by Tweets that mention Benny’s Blog » Blog Archive » Why IT Architecture sucks in many Corporate Environments -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://blog.drtritsch.com/?p=85&cpage=1#comment-92</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Benny’s Blog » Blog Archive » Why IT Architecture sucks in many Corporate Environments -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 22:46:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.drtritsch.com/?p=85#comment-92</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Brian Madden, Michael Keen. Michael Keen said: RT @brianmadden: From @drtritsch &#34;Why IT Architecture sucks in many Corporate Environments&#34; http://bit.ly/6Qx3pk &#60; missing bigger question [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Brian Madden, Michael Keen. Michael Keen said: RT @brianmadden: From @drtritsch &quot;Why IT Architecture sucks in many Corporate Environments&quot; <a href="http://bit.ly/6Qx3pk" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/6Qx3pk</a> &lt; missing bigger question [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Will Cloud Computing Change the Application Landscape by uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://blog.drtritsch.com/?p=80&cpage=1#comment-90</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 22:19:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.drtritsch.com/?p=80#comment-90</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by ReneVester: RT @drtritsch: Check out my new blog article: "Will Cloud Computing Change the Application Landscape?", http://blog.drtritsch.com/?p=80...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by ReneVester: RT @drtritsch: Check out my new blog article: &#8220;Will Cloud Computing Change the Application Landscape?&#8221;, <a href="http://blog.drtritsch.com/?p=80.." rel="nofollow">http://blog.drtritsch.com/?p=80..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Visiting BASTA! by Tweets that mention Benny’s Blog » Blog Archive » Visiting BASTA! -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://blog.drtritsch.com/?p=75&cpage=1#comment-89</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Benny’s Blog » Blog Archive » Visiting BASTA! -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 19:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.drtritsch.com/?p=75#comment-89</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by rickd4real and Bernhard Tritsch. Bernhard Tritsch said: Published a new article about speaking at a dev conference on my blog, see http://blog.drtritsch.com/?p=75 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by rickd4real and Bernhard Tritsch. Bernhard Tritsch said: Published a new article about speaking at a dev conference on my blog, see <a href="http://blog.drtritsch.com/?p=75" rel="nofollow">http://blog.drtritsch.com/?p=75</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
